Flowability
Poor flow can interrupt auger feed and lane balance.
Powder flow, dust, clumping, bridging, density and seal contamination determine the feeding, dosing and test route before output is discussed.
Material Context
The risk map makes each powder condition visible without turning a generic material class into a performance guarantee.
Poor flow can interrupt auger feed and lane balance.
Airborne powder can affect cleanliness and the seal area.
Soft lumps can change feeding and dose consistency.
Hopper geometry and agitation may control discharge.
Density changes alter auger calibration and fill volume.
Drop timing and residue affect the usable seal window.
Auger selection is reviewed with powder supply, hopper geometry, agitation, bulk density and the target fill. The visible assembly does not establish accuracy or material fit.
Engineering Configuration ContextRecord batch state, transfer, de-lumping and buffer feeding.
Review fill, density, screw, hopper and agitation together.
Confirm product head, calibration access and stable feed.
Define samples and acceptance conditions before claims.
Film, stick geometry, powder drop timing and cut-off must be reviewed together. Hardware context alone cannot prove clean sealing.
Engineering Configuration Context
Engineering Configuration ContextOutput, tolerance, lane count and cleaning language stay conditional until representative material and pack inputs support them.
| Input | Required evidence | Decision supported |
|---|---|---|
| Representative sample | Production-relevant batch and sample condition | Observe flow, dust, clumping and moisture response |
| Fill target | Nominal dose and acceptable test method | Review auger, hopper and calibration concept |
| Pack and film | Dimensions, structure and seal window | Check drop path and seal-zone protection |
| Output goal | Required rate or daily target | Confirm only after stable filling and sealing review |
| Cleaning scope | Contact, changeover and containment expectation | Define access and product-contact boundary |
For supplement and pharmaceutical-sensitive powders, the proposal can define the evidence path for product contact, cleanability, changeover, qualification and testing. The approved project record—not a generic badge—states what AIX PACK supplies.
| Requirement | Project output | Evidence gate |
|---|---|---|
| Product contact & cleanability | Contact-part list, access and cleaning/changeover design review | Approved materials and project drawings |
| Contamination & seal protection | Powder containment, residue and seal-zone control points | Agreed risk review and sample/FAT observations |
| Qualification documents | Agreed URS response, DQ, FAT/SAT and IQ/OQ support scope | Document list frozen in contract |
| Project-specific results | Material, film, dose, output and acceptance results under stated conditions | Dated protocol/report with method and conditions |
Zhongjing Dali supports a powder stick pack discussion as a published route reference. It does not establish a fixed configuration, output or performance result.
Public Route ReferenceCompare material state, stick target, sample requirement and line boundary. Do not copy an assumed machine or result from the image.
Review published route boundary See the real 8-lane powder Stick Pack demonstrationShare material behavior, sample status, fill target, pack and output goal. A clear project can proceed to RFQ; an unstable or unknown powder should begin with sample review.